Friday, May 1, 2026
Inspectr+ could let inspectors scan an asset tag or QR code, then attach deficiencies directly to that station element, room, vehicle bay, or platform component. It cuts down the “which door/panel/valve was this?” ambiguity that kills follow-up later.
mobile_scanner, store asset_id on inspection items in Supabase, and prefill location metadata from an assets table.Buildr+ could give reviewers a quick checklist tied to spec sections so submittals are reviewed against the actual contract requirements, not just memory. That makes rejection reasons cleaner and creates a stronger record for transit/infrastructure work.
spec_checklists table keyed by CSI/spec section, then show reusable Flutter checklist chips inside the submittal review screen with pass/fail/notes saved to Supabase.DailyReportr+ could add structured reason codes when planned work does not happen — weather, access, material delay, inspection hold, crew unavailable. Over time, Leonard gets a delay pattern dashboard instead of scattered notes.